* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060307 16:22]: > On Tue, 07 Mar 2006, Marc Haber wrote: > > I note that it took you 16 days to reply, and that you seem to want to > > build a dependency between a change which is not strictly needed to > > make a point release (if it were needed, why was it possible to > > release 3.1r1?) and 3.1r2. May I ask why? > > It seemed obvious to me. If uploads to s-p-u are blocked for approval by > the SRM, this needs to happen just after a point release so that s-p-u is > empty > to start with the new system (probably because once a package is in s-p-u, > there's no easy way to remove it and removing manually doesn't make much > sense).
And what is the problem to introduce that with 3.1r3 or even 3.1r4? (Though of course the original mail should still be answered, but why is this a blocking point for the point release?) Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
