On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:55:34AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If GDB were under BSD, you could: > > > > 1. Add docstrings to the sources of GDB in a way permissible by > > GFDL. In particular the invariant sections should be present in > > all opaque copies of the produced documentation. GFDL does not > > place restrictions on how the invariant sections are present in > > the transparent form, so it is enough if they exist in separate > > files. > > > > 2. Add the text of the BSD license in a new invariant section. > > > > 3. Use the following license for the new GDB sources: > > > > Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify THE NAME > > under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version > > 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software > > Foundation; with with the Invariant Sections being LIST THEIR > > TITLES, with the Front-Cover Texts being LIST, and with the > > Back-Cover Texts being LIST. > > > > Additionally, you have permission to use the non-commented parts > > of the sources of THE NAME under the following license: > > > > INCLUDE THE BSD LICENSE HERE > > And the result would be a *non-free program*.
This is strange. :-) The program is covered under BSD license and you say it is non-free. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
