On Feb 09, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This may be annoying for you, but it's a fact that there is an > > interpretation of the old wording which has been used for years to > > accept non-free documentation into main. > How is this relevant? It shows that there was a widely accepted meaning of what "software" is in the context of the DFSG, so the change was not "editorial".
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
