On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 03:33:10PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > So I don't understand what you're trying to get at, or what possible > relevance this theoretical discussion could have to anything else we're > talking about.
If we have many documents covered under GFDL and all of them contain different invariant sections, it might be impractical to combine all of them into a new document. This was used as an evidence that GFDL is a non-free license. My point was that this can not be used as an argument that GFDL is non-free because GFDL explicitly permits licenses that disallow any combined works. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
