This one time, at band camp, Mike Hommey said: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:37:00PM +0000, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > This one time, at band camp, Mike Hommey said: > > > You forgot something... > > > > > > > If you publish or distribute Opaque copies of the Document > > > > numbering more than 100, you must either include a machine-readable > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > Er, that just means if you distribute 100 copies, you need provide > > neither a transparent copy or a link. > s/neither/either/ > > Which means the link thing Craig is talking about doesn't apply for > small quantities.
Right. Do you see a requirement like this for copies <= 100 ? My first reading is that this means, if you distribute > 100 copies, you must do either A or B. If you distbute <= 100 copies, these requirements do not apply, as they are not spelled out. Admittedly, it's a stupid rule. However, you seem to be arriving at an entirely different interpretation than I do. Can you point me to the verbiage that gave you your interpretation? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
