On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:17:24PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 19 lines which said:
> I think -legal came to a very definite consensus that licensing the > documentation under the exact same license as the program was always > the right thing to do. I agree. In some countries (I checked for France), it is the default (the documentation of a software is regarded as software). > It saves *so* much trouble. But not all documentation is attached to a software. For instance, if I write a book "Software development on Debian", releasing it under the GFDL is still the reasonable thing to do. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
