On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 08:16:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: Hi,
> I initially felt this way and tried making this argument to Anthony on > IRC, but he wasn't having any of it: as I understand it (not wishing to > put words into his mouth), he feels that making a new release knowing > that it violates the social contract is qualitatively different from > putting up with the old release that met the promises in the old > contract but not the new one. After some discussion, I have to say I was > convinced. > > Ultimately, it's the release manager who gets most say in this one. > I see... I was a bit skeptic about reverting the editorial changes just for some months... I think I'm going to second your proposal which doesn't revert back the changes for a small timeframe but apoligizes with the users within the SC... Thanks, Guido
