On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:07:25PM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 04:59:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > I feel that the most honest approach is to note in the Social Contract > > itself that we apologize for not living up to those principles just > > yet. > > Such an apology is not necessary language for the Social Contract.
I think it's very much part of the Contract, given that it's the Contract itself from which we're apologizing for slipping. > Updating the DFSG web page would be sufficient to inform the Debian user > of the current state of the project with respect to the two versions of > the SC we currently use. This could include your proposed apology. Also /usr/share/doc/debian/social-contract.txt. I think we might as well amend the SC anyway, since I think my amendment ought to require supermajority anyway. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
