Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:05:57PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> >> This would clarify the main point that has been spawning endless attempts >> by occasional maintainers to sneak non-free stuff into "main". > > what "endless attempts" would these be? have there been any incidents in > the real world (i.e. outside of your fevered imagination)?
Oh, let's see, "firmware" in the kernel, GFDL docs, boot sectors, RFCs, and that's off the top of my head. Mindi/mondo (which contained, among other things, pico). Those enough "incidents" for you? > you bigots lost the vote (you didn't even come close) - can't you please > just > shut up and go away? Um, I have nothing against having "non-free", I'm against having non-free stuff in "main". Hello?!? Not the same thing. > do you really have to try to continue the > "discussion", by any desperate means possible? > > craig > -- Make sure your vote will count. http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
