Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I gathered that you were interested in seeing the vote split up into > multiple votes on every single section because you weren't happy with > the amendment in total rather than inviting a discussion on the > perceived issue(s) with different section(s) of the amendment.
No, my goal is not just to cast a vote, but also to hone the proposal. I'm still thinking over the details of the wording. > Why not start a discussion dealing with the actual issue(s) then? I'm still thinking over the detail of the wording. I suspect the meta-issue has taken enough time already so I'll drop this (which was just a brief idea anyway), and once I've had time for my thoughts about wording to gel, I'll post them. > 1: Considering you were trumpeting the debian list guidelines > recently, could you please consider following them? I try to remember. Emacs still doesn't do the Right Thing quite reliably enough.
