On 21 Mar 2004 11:47:03 -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I've even complained about this more than once on debian-devel,
>> > and been told to just get over it.
>>
>> You do have to learn to deal with group dynamics of any large
>> social organization, yes.
> Ok, what is your suggestion to deal with the case? I have tried
Discuss it with the DPL. Bring the discussion over to
debian-devel, tru to get other people involved in the discussion,
perhaps that shall get the maintainer to change. Failing that, file a
report with the tech ctte; this seems an open and shut case of things
not to do with the bts
> reopening the bug, but that works only for that bug. Is anyone
> going to tell Christian Marillat that it's not appropriate to close
> bugs just because upstream says "we won't fix this"?
The tech ctte can, if gentler means of persuasion fail.
manoj
--
"I'd love to go out with you, but I did my own thing and now I've got
to undo it."
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
