* Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-12 15:53]: > > Furthermore, I'd like to hear why you think that I am not honest > > and enthusiastic, and ideally I'd like to see some concrete > > examples.
> <Eliza> Why is it that you think I said *you* were not h&e? </Eliza> > (and I don't expect you to answer that here, but I do hope you'll think > about it) Because you explictly said so, unless I've mistaken your mail. I was surprised by this (because I think I'm honest and enthusiastic) which is why I asked. You wrote: | My concern is that we find a DPL who is *honest* and *enthusiastic* | about the future they see for the project and who is prepared to share | that vision unabashedly with anyone who will listen. | What I'm seeing (again) from the two mainstream candidates, is that they | have their own personal reasons for wanting to be DPL, and that they are | prepared to talk up whatever other issues they think will win them | support to that end. This seems to suggests that you think both Branden and I are dishonest and not enthusiastic. > The only 'example' I can hold you to is your own promises. It has > been claimed that you were in fact something of a Do Nothing DPL -- > my own personal experience with you has indeed shown that you've > been quite low key compared to what I was led to expect at the last > election. The kind of tasks I carry out are summarized for example in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200310/msg00014.html I think they are all very important, and while you may often not notice those changes, they are vital in order to ensure that the project is running smoothly. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
