* Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> [2004-03-03 14:37]: > Hrm, you're right. I was trying to find some quotes that indicated you > both thought that, technically, things were acceptable as they are; > Martin's comment doesn't quite indicate that out of context. The quotes > were meant to indicate you were of a similar mind on that issue.
I am interested in improving technical matters, and my actions and work for Debian clearly how that (for the example my QA work). In any case, while I didn't mention this explicitly, I consider dpkg a "core team" as well (even if in a slightly different sense then the others teams). And as you can see from http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2004/debian-dpkg-200403/msg00002.html some progress is slowly being made. Also, http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/debian-devel-announce-200403/msg00000.html shows you that I am interested in organizing meetings between our KDE maintainers and putting them in closer contact with upstream, and I have done the same for our GNOME team, and the Java people. All of this is aimed towards improving the technical quality in Debian. Please keep what I said about core teams in mind and re-read "Internal - Core Teams, Delegates, Communication, Transparency". Many of the points I raise there equally apply to (big) packages and other technical matters. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
