On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 02:43:03PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:11:27 -0500, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > > This would eliminate confusion such as that from Ted Ts'o in > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200402/msg00135.html. > > > It also fits the English-language meaning better. > > What if the amendment is really an amendment, and not an > alternative, unlike the current case?
Maybe we should have both ? Friendly, Sven Luther
