On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:35:58PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:58:03 -0600, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > My present understanding is that the non-free removal GR I > > originally proposed back in 2000, which received sufficient seconds > > to proceed, was placed "on hold" by you after you assumed the > > secretary position (see links in the above message). > > > If other related proposals are to be voted on imminently, would it > > make sense to vote on this one simultaneously? If so, what would be > > the procedure for making it be no longer "on hold"? > > Would you please repropose your version, and seek seconds for > it? I would much rather not revive a 3 1/2 year old expired proposal > (the hold was meant to say that proposals of this ilk should not be > considered unti other issues have been resolved, and not that the old > proposal could be revived)
Isn't it about time to invoke the expiry clause on that old thing? -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
