AJ wrote: > What makes more sense? Keeping stuff our users rely on and expect > available, having productive relationships with upstream and helping > improve their software, or blindly adhering to an ideal, brooking no > exceptions and ignoring any negative consequences? May I rephrase this question to match what I see as the facts?
What makes more sense? Keeping stuff some of our users rely on and expect available, having counterproductive relationships with upstreams (who provide non-free stuff and expect it to be put in main while we improve their programs) -- or adhering to our ideals, fulfilling our contract with our users, and encouraging the creation of free software? Thank you. :-)
