> > We're promising that our system will stay free -- On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:43:12PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > I can't find that assumption in your proposal. You say that 'the Free > Software in Debian will remain Free' and 'We will distribute Free > Software'(paraphrased). That doesn't mean that the Debian distribution > will not include non-free software, as I read it. > > Perhaps that's you intention or perhaps I misread it. But if I misread > it, others will probably, too.
I agree, but I don't have a better proposal yet. Anthony Towns' proposal is pretty good, but it needs a definition for "The Debian Distribution". I don't suppose you've got a good idea [for either the proposal as a whole, or a definition of what it is that the "remains free" guarantees of the social contract apply to]? Thanks, -- Raul
