On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 05:10:55PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > I am pointing out there is another interpretation - a third. You chose > two interpretations, neither of which (necessarily) are "best". I'm not > saying mine is either, only pointing out a third interpretation.
For my purposes, it's not distinct. The same rationale which eliminates [B] is sufficient to eliminate your [C]. > And choosing your interpretations/ assumptions will (naturally) have > consequences with regard to the ensuing fla^Wdiscussion. Sure, but I don't see much point in building up a collection of ever-more-bogus interpretations. -- Raul
