Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jan 18, 2004, at 18:27, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote: > >> Remi Vanicat wrote: >>> "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> In this case, I clearly disagree with you. By stopping to distribute >>> non-free we will decrease the amount of good, and so act non-ethical. >> >> Where is this good, which we will decrease? Do you think that >> dropping non-free will broke the upstream copy, or it will destroy >> the copy of those who downloded it? Where is the harm? > > There is no harm per se, however, there is the good we did not do > (because we were no longer able).
we were never able to do it. Or we are able to do it (in case of a GFDL like package for example). -- Rémi Vanicat
