On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:17:49PM +0100, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote: > To be more precise: of course, narcotic or hammer can not be evil or > good without associtated human action. When I'm saying non-free software > is mostly evil, the associated action is "distributing by Debian". So > the complete phrase is "distributing by Debian non-free software is > mostly evil".
I wish I knew why you think it's evil for Debian to distribute non-free. You've stated that it's an ethical issue for you. You've drawn an analogy with illegal drugs. You've stated that it's not good for Debian's developers or users [regardless of any good that the software does, and regardless of any freeness in that software]. But your arguments seem to be circular -- without basis. Let's assume that your difficulty in presenting your views is in translation. Can you enlist the assistance of someone else, to help you translate? Thanks, -- Raul
