On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:32:37PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > One of the most blatent examples of this logical flaw is that a system > of ethics which prohibits us from distributing any of non-free would > have us not distribute GFDL licensed documentation.
Where's the flaw in that? We probably *are* going to chuck GFDL licensed documents because they're non-free (that's next on the list of things to tackle when the question of whether or not non-free gets dropped entirely is settled). Seems perfectly consistent to me. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
