On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:29:46PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:20:39PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > I actually (mis)read you that you wanted Asuffield to combine the two > > proposals into one, which I was opposed against. If it is possible to > > put them both on the same ballot so that it's clear what's up (and > > Andrew thinks it's alright), then that's fine with me. > > Well, I was suggesting that "non-free + editorial" and "editorial" > was a more useful set of proposals than "non-free" and "editorial" > as stand alone proposals.
We could end up with rather a lot of options though; Editorial changes; Editorial changes + Andrew's remove non-free proposal Andrew's remove non-free proposal only Editorial changes + Raul's clarify non-free proposal Raul's clarify non-free proposal only Further discussion ie no change Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
