On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:16:45PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > We don't provide security support for non-free, to my knowledge. > > We have infrastructure for it, we don't make use of it at the moment. > > > I believe most (if not all) of the other issues could be solved by > > running an Alioth-like service. > > I don't think Debian running an Alioth-like service would be any better > than anyone else running an Alioth-like service (ie, it'd have all the > same benefits and problems as nonfree.org). Am I wrong? > > > I proposed that several times on this list, but never got a feedback. Is > > this so far off? Or so clear without ambiguity? > > Cheers, > aj
Thank you. That's the most enlightening exchange I've yet seen in this thread, precisely because of what's left unsaid. -- G. Branden Robinson | The best place to hide something is Debian GNU/Linux | in documentation. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Ethan Benson http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
