On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 08:16:52PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 07:41:27PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Uhm, if it was not a GR proposal, then why did your message[13] say > > > "non-free removal GR draft"? > > > > Please check the meaning of the word "draft" in the dictionary. Sure, i > > don't have the chance to be a native english speaker, but assuredly, a > > draft (or a brouillon in french) is something quite different from the > > finished thing, and something which can be used to express the ideas > > without all the needed administrativia which could be done later. > > But I believe you don't vote on drafts, you vote on the 'real' thing. > > I (and probably others) however had the impression that you actually > wanted people to vote on something that was *not* a GR proposal, but > merely a poll to gauge interest.
Yep. But then you all said this was stupid or something, that we were loosing time, and ... So, i actually changed minds, and was going to try doing a real proposal or something, but as i perfectly know that my writing is not of the style needed to do a formal proposal, i was a bit informal first, trying to get first the idea right, before doing the real thing, and propose it. > Sorry if I misread you. No problem. Friendly, Sven Luther
