On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:27:14AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > Although I don't see anything wrong with your wording, I don't see what > this amendment would actually get us if it succeeded. The wording still > leaves open the question of whether "we have created [sections on > our ftp site]" means "we must keep these sections on our ftp site". The > wording change also does not seem to address any of the reasons users > currently perceive non-free as part of Debian.
Noted. Sven raised much the same issue. At this point, I'm aware of three flaws in this proposal: [1] It doesn't even suggest a migration towards more free software. [2] It doesn't mention LSB, which it probably should. [3] I didn't sign the proposal. I'm going to wait a day or so to see if anyone else indicates any other flaws. If no one else has written up a better proposal by then, I'll update the one I submitted. Thanks, -- Raul
