On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:12:34 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:09:36PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:05:52PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > Sorry, "insincere ballot options" doesn't parse. Insincere
>> > voting refers to the process of strategically ranking options on
>> > a ballot in a way that does not correspond to the voter's true
>> > preference. You must be using the word "insincere" to mean
>> > something completely different here.
>>
>> By "insincere ballot option" I mean an option which does not
>> represent the true preference of the people proposing it.
> Too late. That already happened, and both Manoj and I participated
> in it. I'm pretty sure neither of us felt we were doing anything
> morally questionable.
> Which vote this was is left as an exercise for the reader.
Come again? What insincere ballot did I participate in? I
wish you would give details when throwing off these offhand innuendos
of yours.
manoj
--
It'll be a nice world if they ever get it finished.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
