On 2004-01-07 04:18:38 +0000 Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
wrote:
i is the time saved by not having to worry about non-free stuff. I
expect
that's pretty small, but non-zero.
n is the time taken trying to maintain software with poorer
infrastructure
than Debian has.
X is the time taken maintaining that infrastructure
b is the extra time people devote to Debian because of our righteous
stand;
it's negative if time's lost.
b = i - (n+X)
I'm not sure that b can be expressed so neatly. At the very least, you
could also have D, the developer time currently not given to debian
because of non-free but not spent on non-free, and against that there
is d, the developer time currently given to debian by developers who
quit over this. They may both be sizeable, for all we know just now.
You also seem to dismiss the possibility that external infrastructures
could outperform Debian in the limit, which would make n negative
eventually. There are probably other variables we missed.
I might be wrong, of course, but that no one seems to be willing to
setup
a working non-free archive just for the hell of it seems to indicate X
isn't trivially small.
It looks like some things need clarifying (eg Origin/Bugs) to make
that effort much more than a folly if this vote doesn't succeed. I
can't blame people for not wanting to build follies.
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
