On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:04:11PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > The real answer here is that we should seek a system where the most > strategically beneficial vote is the one that's also sincere. > Cloneproof SSD is supposed to provide this. If the introduction of > default options violates this property, that's something that should be > considered.
I agree. > That said, I don't agree with the claim that one can never prefer > "further discussion" over any (or all) of the options on a ballot. I don't think anyone made such a claim. I certainly didn't. Can we leave the straw men in the fields, please? :) -- G. Branden Robinson | I must confess to being surprised Debian GNU/Linux | by the magnitude of incompatibility [EMAIL PROTECTED] | with such a minor version bump. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Manoj Srivastava
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
