On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:51:59PM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Was there any specific reason to use "3:1 majority" and "3:1 > super-majority" in a same section for Proposal A and C? They look > inconsistent to me but seem to cause no real impact.
[as discussed with Manoj on IRC] I hereby request that the Project Secretary amend the "Proposal C" ballot option, which I proposed, to use the term "majority" instead of "super-majority". I further suggest that any permutation of the term "super-majority", including "supermajority" and "super majority", also be altered to "majority" in those portions of the ballot which are not options. Sorry to delay the onset of voting for this. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | De minimis non curat lex. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
