On 2003-10-14, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --=-+Y+8urcJMKE7MvxkX+xD > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 21:28, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> And what is the difference between a 3:1 majority and a 3:1 >> super majority? If there is no difference, why can't the terms be >> used interchangeably? > > Using two different technical terms makes it seem like there is a > distinction. Also, a "3:1 majority" is a contradiction; a majority is > defined as "The greater number or part; a number more than half of the > total."[0]. If we require more than 50%+1, we no longer require a > majority, we require a supermajority, "a specified majority of votes, > such as 60 percent, required to approve a motion or pass > legislation."[1] > > [0], [1] The American Heritage=AE Dictionary of the English > Language, Fourth Edition via dictionary.com
But surely, (a) this is not a big deal, and (b) it's rather late to fix this? Peace, Dylan