On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:16:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > It occurs to me that there are some people who may wish to afford the > Debian Social Contract the opportunity of a 25% minority veto, but not > wish to extend this to the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
Last time I checked, the Debian Free Software Guidelines were a part of the Debian Social Contract. I'm not sure why the rationale for your proposed amendment doesn't explicitly acknowledge this. > I do not, however, see why a 3:1 supermajority should be required to > modify a document with as narrow a focus as the DFSG has. Hmm... given that the DFSG have been the prototypical definition for "Open Source", I find this inability to see on your part rather bemusing. -- Raul
