On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:58:59PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > To be honest I wonder if this GR is only going to pass because of > indifference. I wonder how many developers have actually read through > the GR and understand it. I'm amazed at how little explanation there has > been aimed at the non-voting geeks.
The idea is that non-voting geeks don't need to care about this vote, anyway. All of the changes we're making are procedural, not structural. Both the quorum changes and the supermajority changes should have the same result as the current two-vote system (a vote with multiple options that ignores supermajority/quorum, followed by a vote about the winning option with just Yes/No/FD that takes supermajority & quorum into account) in all reasonable circumstances. > I wonder how it would stand up to the scrutiny of a lot more eyes. I'd question the value of the scrutinisation of eyes that aren't interested in the details. (The people who are interested in the details are, by definition, voting geeks) Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Is this some kind of psych test? Am I getting paid for this?''
pgpApLF4NWSF0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
