On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:47:29PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > Enforced voting in order to ensure quorum is precisely an outcome I > *don't* want. Lack of quorum indicates lack of interest in the issue, > and such a lack of interest should be given appropriate consideration. > Requiring uninterested parties to vote "all ones" for purposes of quorum > would give a victory to whichever of the insignificant[1] minority > groups has the largest turnout.
To be honest I wonder if this GR is only going to pass because of indifference. I wonder how many developers have actually read through the GR and understand it. I'm amazed at how little explanation there has been aimed at the non-voting geeks. I wonder how it would stand up to the scrutiny of a lot more eyes. There still seem to be some unresolved issues. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
