Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:10:56AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I've always taken it to mean "ignoring the slight possibility that > > > > people who have voted didn't mean what they said". > > > > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 08:02:00PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > I am not sure that the possibility is slight, really. > > > > Oh? In the elections you have details on, roughly how many ballots > > (out of how many total) got changed? > > Here, I've got an anecdote that will scare you straight. > > It's my understanding that if the 2003 DPL election had been terminated > 48 hours early (without advance warning), I would be your DPL today.
Yeah, but probably because a buch of new votes came in late. Not because people changed their vote. The proposal was for when a high majority of votes are already cast early, right? > There. That ought to get everyone on board for Manoj's proposal. :) Not really. I voted for you. :-) Peter
