[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Osamu Aoki) writes: > What shall be done if there is a conflict between "user" and "freedom".
> [X] Seek amicable compromise Until/unless our Social Contract changes, that's what we've promised to do! I passionately support freedom. I care about our users. For what it's worth, I can't remember any specific instance where I personally felt those were in conflict. > Do you think we need to change situation over non-free? My answer to a nearly identical question from Jordi Mallach during the campaign last year still reflects my thoughts on this pretty well: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2002/debian-vote-200203/msg00062.html If it matters, "non-free" appears in sources.list on many fewer of my systems than it did a year ago. That feels like progress to me, but I haven't looked recently at what's still in non-free and so I don't have any personal opinion about how "important" it might still seem to our users. Bdale
