On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 09:20:59PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > The first attempt didn't make it, apparently.
Yes, it turns out that it double-bounced before it got to lists.debian.org. > > c. An option, A, defeats an option, B, if N(A,B)*V(A,B) is > > larger than N(A,B)*V(B,A), and the (A,B) defeat has not > > been dropped. > > This does not make sense. One of the N(A,B)s needs to be N(B,A). Thanks. Should be: . . c. An option, A, defeats an option, B, if N(A,B)*V(A,B) is . . larger than N(B,A)*V(B,A), and the (A,B) defeat has not . . been dropped. > > e. If a majority of n:1 is required for A, and B is the default > > option, N(B,A) is n. In all other cases, N(B,A) is 1. > > I would generalize that to n:m (a 60% majority is 3:2, for instance). Why? Describing this would make the draft more verbose -- what does this complexity do for us? > > 4. If there are defeats within the Schwartz set, we drop the weakest > > such defeats, and return to step 4. > > > Step 3 -- you need to construct a new Schwartz set! Thanks, I overlooked this when I renumbered the options. -- Raul
