Hello, On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:12:03PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:54:30PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > [1] The simplest: discard supermajority entirely. Nothing special is > > required to override "important decisions". This has some elegantly > > simple mathematical properties but I don't know of any other argument > > for it. > > I support this. I'd rather see whether or not we screw up in the > absence of supermajority requirements instead of just assuming that we > will. I agree with this,
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/privat.html
pgpboOOmkdRjT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
