On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:55:05PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:10:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > *shrug* I don't care about quorums :) > > We could trivially deal with quorums by saying: "The quorum is met > > if Q ballots are received from distinct voters. If quorum is not met, > > the default option wins." > Let's say quorum is 45. Let's say we have a ballot with two options, > A and B. No supermajority. B is the default option. Votes are:
Like I said, I don't care about quorums. That sort of behaviour is more traditional though: you have a quorum of 10, 9 people turn up, but nothing can get done. Another person turns up, doesn't matter how he votes, stuff can get done. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
