> > What do you think of the idea of repeatedly re-using the votes with > > supermajority and default swapped, after adopting an option with > > supermajority, until the result stops changing?
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 09:02:06PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Will it always? Yes. Unless there's a tie and the person with the casting vote chooses differently each time. I should disallow that. > Does that method still conform to the same criteria > Condorcet+CSSD does? Well... let's put it this way: It conforms to the same criteria as the Nov 16 draft conforms to. I'm asking if there are any specific criteria that it doesn't conform to. [But I want to know what those criteria are.] > I don't know, and frankly I don't like that kind of rule because it will > make a controversial vote [otherwise the result wouldn't change in the > first place] even more controversial. Please give an example? Thanks, -- Raul
