Hello, > On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 12:48:07PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > 1. [...] Any options unranked by the voter are treated > > as being equal to all other unranked options.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 07:47:39PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote: > I still do not understand the "other unranked options". > Could we simply write "Any options unranked by the voter are treated > as being equal" or would this be something else. That sounds fine. Thanks. > > 6. [...] This procedure and must be carried out in the following order: > ^^^ > The "and" seems spurious to me. Yes. > I'm getting further with the draft. Especially I understand > "proposition" and "weak proposition", now. But ... > > > Definition: a weakest proposition is a weak proposition where > > the vote count in the proposition which is not larger than > > the other vote count is also no smaller than that of any > > other weak proposition. > ... this is hard stuff. What about "minimum of the two vote counts" > instead of "the vote count in the proposition which is not larger than > the other vote count"? I think that would be fine. Thanks again, -- Raul
