On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 07:21:34PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > Pursuant to Appendix A of the Debian Constitution and the guidelines offered > at http://www.debian.org/vote/howto_proposal, I hereby offer the following > draft proposal as the beginning of a General Resolution process to decide > this issue.
I second the proposal in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as posted to the debian-vote list by John Goerzen. > Sponsors should reply to this message. According to the guidelines, all > other discussion is to occur in debian-devel, and I will start a thread > there with some prelminary analyses of this proposal. -project is a better list, but if the secretary's guidelines say to use -devel instead, I guess you're stuck. Maybe the guidelines should be updated? I would like to a very minor amendment to this proposal. I will not withdraw my second if you elect not to accept it. > D. That the maintainer of the Debian Policy Manual, or an appointee of > the Debian Project Leader, be directed to update that manual [...] > E. That the maintainers of the Debian archives and website, or an > appointee of the Debian Project Leader, be directed to implement the s/appointee/delegate/ I think it is preferable that we employ in this resolution the term used by the Constitution for such people. -- G. Branden Robinson | People are equally horrified at Debian GNU/Linux | hearing the Christian religion [EMAIL PROTECTED] | doubted, and at seeing it http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | practiced. -- Samuel Butler
pgpeqYLhpLhhY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
