On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:29:03AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:28:17PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 10:12:08PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > > > > This is still not accepting my key. I'm using GPG with an RSA/IDEA key > > > > (generated with PGP originally). I confirmed that the signature is OK. > > > > The updated key was accepted into the keyring several weeks ago. > > > > > > In plain terms.. Your mailer is screwed up and is violating the standards. > > > > [..] > > > > > So please, if you are using mutt, configure it correctly. > > > > Can you tell me how? I use the example code from > > /usr/doc/mutt/examples/gpg.rc. > Interesting, maybe the vote script doe not handle detached(?) signatures? > My mutt signature did not work either, but when I look at the Fcc, mutt > checks the sig ok... so mutt is totally out of rfc? > > Yeah, I know, real men use Emacs...
I submitted mine via mutt, detached, and it worked fine. -- -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------ / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
