Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > Then how can they possibly be voted on together?
Because their proponents, seconders, and the Secretary think this is the most sensible way to proceed, and they're right. And you think they're right, and nobody's said they're wrong. If you like, we can shuttle all this under the question of "cases of doubt" as mentioned in A.3.6. The Constitution is silent on what to do if several related but formally independent and mutually inconsistent proposals are proposed contemporaneously, and the Secretary and the proposers are proceeding in the most sensible way. Thomas
