On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:12:22AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > [ ] yes to a > [ ] no to a [ ] yes to a AND b > [ ] yes to b <===> [ ] yes to b alone > [ ] no to b [ ] further discussion > [ ] further discussion >
Would [ ] no to a and b be needed also ? So that you could vote for none of the changes without further discution (not that that is what i want ot vote, bt the possibility should be there ... Friendly, sven Luther
