WRT the resolution proposing the removal of non-free, the following irregularities have occured with the process.
1. The Secretary has made a decision by fiat stating that a 3:1 supermajority is required for its passage, despite contradictory language in the Constitution. 2. Confusion has surrounded the ballot regarding aj's amendment. 3. There has been a suggestion that because of the Secretary's inaction, the proposal and the amendment have expired. This places us in unknown territory since the Secretary already issued a ballot. Furthermore, it leaves us in a nasty situation whereby a single person can kill any resolution by ignoring it. 4. During the Secretary's absence, the Constitution specifies that the chairman of the Technical Committee should step up in his place. However, that person is Ian Jackson and he failed with this duty. The Technical Committee have failed to replace him with someone more active in the Project. -- John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.complete.org Sr. Software Developer, Progeny Linux Systems, Inc. www.progenylinux.com #include <std_disclaimer.h> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
