On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 10:14:54PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote: > My post was made solely to point out the illogic of Hamish Moffatt's > equivalence between "throwing out the Social Contract on a whim", which was > what he accused John Goerzen of attempting to do, and the text of John's > General Resolution, which, whatever its faults, cannot reasonably be > construed as a repeal or withdrawl of the Social Contract. > > In the GR thread on -devel I posted a quite exhaustive analysis, for which > I was serverely chastised, of the committments made by the Social Contract > and exactly which of those committments are affected by this proposed GR.
Ok. Please don't take my post personally. I just want to emphasize that I think we should change the constitution before we deal with John's changes. [Not that I feel up to drafting the constitutional ammendment -- maybe after I get some other things off my plate.] Thanks, -- Raul
