***** DOB => Darren O Benham DOB> On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 12:19:44AM +0200, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote: >> What about the proposer of a vote writing the pros, and---at the end >> of the discussion period---anybody so inclined submitting cons by >> means of a procedure similar to the amendment one (i.e., with a proper >> number of supporters, I mean). DOB> I don't know that it has to be that formal. We're not THAT impersonal DOB> yet..
Maybe I was a bit unclear: everybody may obviously express cons in any appropriate forum, just the cons on the web pages should have a proper number of supporters. This way you can be sure people who share the same cons will work together to produce a unified list, and people who argue against some proposal on silly grounds won't likely get any supporter at all, with no need for some `editor' to decide what's good and what's not for the web pages. Just to clarify, I was unsure if I was clear enough. Regards, -- Davide G. M. Salvetti - IW5DZC [JN53fr] - <http://www.linux.it/%7Esalve/> <http://www.gnu.org/> * <http://www.debian.org/> * <http://www.linux.org>
