On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 09:38:48AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > > Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > My complaint comes from the fact that there was absolutely no > > > discussion about this new vote prior to it being proposed. > > > > If that were true, I might sympathize. Since it's not true, I have to > > wonder just what you're trying to pull here. (To be kind, I'll assume > > that this is just hyperbole.) > > OK, show me any discussion in the archives (URL's please) ---- I've looked, > and didn't find any. > > The only replies to the proposal mail were ``seconded'' type responses, with > no attempt to show a justification for the view.
... > > Pretty hard to get any seconds without a discussion.... :-) > > saying ``seconded'' doesn't count as discussing an issue IMO. I can't speak for the other seconds, but I did have a discussion with Branden before I seconded it. And more specifically, I recall discussing this during the original logo vote, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > * raul (swirl) > > Concept: magic being release from a genie bottle. > > Pros: simple, good associations, already in a good format (EPS) > > Cons: none :) > > This is my favorite of the bunch, except for one thing - even more than > with jeanette, I think the two logos should be switched. I think that > the logo with an added feature should be the official one. (Note that that message is on the non-web-archived portion of -vote) Dan /--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
