On Jun 22, Chris Waters wrote: > Shane King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The pragmatic approach is just as hypocritical, if not more so. You've > > basically said it's ok for debian to be pragmatic while telling the users > > they should not be pragmatic and instead rely on only software which > > conforms to the DFSG. That is hypocricy, pure and simple. > > Oh COME ON people! We already have the contrib and non-free in a > separate tree. Moving it to a separate host will not make it ONE BIT > harder to find or install. Claiming that this change will force users > to rely on "only" DFSG-compliant software is sheer hyberbole! Buy a > clue!
I thought the intent of the proposal *was* to make non-free software harder to find... or at least harder to confuse with main. (Also, could we keep this discussion on debian-vote, please!) Chris -- ============================================================================= | Chris Lawrence | Get your Debian 2.1 CD-ROMs | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.lordsutch.com/ | | | | | Amiga A4000 604e/233Mhz | Join the party that opposed the CDA | | with Linux/APUS 2.2.8 | http://www.lp.org/ | =============================================================================
