On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:15:22 +0000, Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think that Wesley may be thinking more along the lines of a
>> simple replay attack -- if you *do* change your mind, your earlier
>> (publically posted) ballot can be fed back into the system again,
>> to reset your preferences to those you originally chose.
> I /believe/ that there's a replay cache to prevent a naive replay
> attack
Umm, it does have a replay cache. How does a sophisticated
replay attack differ from a naive one?
> - I'm not sure if it insists that the order of signing is consistent
> with the order of receipt.
Umm, I am not sure I understand what this means.
manoj
--
Coward, n.: One who in a perilous emergency thinks with his
legs. Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
